Current:Home > MarketsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -SummitInvest
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
EchoSense Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-10 20:08:16
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Stranger Things' Natalia Dyer and Charlie Heaton Cozy Up During Rare Red Carpet Event
- Dancing With the Stars Is Quickstepping Back to ABC After Move to Disney+
- Clifton Garvin
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- How the Search for Missing Mom Ana Walshe Led to Her Husband Being Charged With Murder: All the Details
- The Hunger Games: Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes Trailer Will Transport You Right Back to Panem
- Met Gala 2023: Proof Patrick Mahomes and Brittany Mahomes Win Even Off the Field
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Cher and Boyfriend Alexander Edwards Break Up
Ranking
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Kendall Jenner Only Used Drugstore Makeup for Her Glamorous Met Gala 2023 Look
- Kendall Jenner Slips Into Another Risqué Look for Met Gala 2023 After-Party With Bad Bunny
- Kim Kardashian Teases Her Purrfect Fashion Preparation for 2023 Met Gala
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Jessica Chastain Debuts Platinum-Blonde Hair Transformation at Met Gala 2023
- Wayfair Way Day Doorbusters: Last Day to Get $119 Sheets for $16 and Deals on KitchenAid, Dyson, and More
- The Fate of Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon's The Morning Show Revealed
Recommendation
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
Sharna Burgess Details Brian Austin Green and Megan Fox's Co-Parenting Relationship
Kim Kardashian's Met Gala 2023 Look Might Be Her Most Iconic Ever
Today’s Climate: April 23, 2010
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
Glen Powell and Girlfriend Gigi Paris Break Up
Today’s Climate: April 17-18, 2010
All the Celebrity Couples Turning Met Gala 2023 Into the Ultimate Date